We were able to identify our target audience’s needs
by creating and carrying out research, such as questionnaires. We then
collected the results from this research and analysed it carefully by producing
data diagrams, such as pie charts, helping us to come to evaluate the elements
that we should include in our production. Our target audience is 16-23 year
olds because our intentions were to target it at students studying media as
they can observe the techniques we used. On top of this the audience should be
able to understand the topics used in the film, for example espionage and
murder, and the complex plot. In addition to this we would expect this type of
film to be of interest to this age group.
The
questionnaire that we created included 15 questions all relating to our sub-genre.
Questions asked were similar to the one above and others quizzed topics like
specific sub-genres and what works well in a thriller in your opinion. We
wanted to retrieve a large amount of data from this questionnaire to make it
more reliable and so gave it to several people in our media class and other
media classes from other schools. Not only that but we also sent some copies to
Bath University for media students there to give us their feedback.
This
proved to be a very useful form of research and we were able to make educated
assumptions from it. We found that the most popular sub-genres of thriller are
conspiracy and psychological, as expected. This helped us as a group to choose
the conspiracy sub-genre to base our film on; we decided that this would be a
little different from the ever-so common psychological thrillers. Another very
useful piece of feedback was in response to ‘the key things that grab your
attention in thrillers’. As shown in the chart above the more popular choices
were characters, editing and costume, this was a great response for us as a
small production team because of the low budget these were going to be the
subjects we would rely on the most.
We
also gathered from our research that our film would be more appealing to males.
This was neither a great surprise nor setback for our team as it is a
conspiracy thriller. Similarly the Bourne Trilogy and James Bond have this
demographic and are still both extremely popular films. Here I have created an
audience profile for the kind of person we would expect to watch our film.
Demographic
|
Answer
|
Gender
|
Male
|
Age
|
20
|
General Interests
|
Media, music, film, editing, photography
|
TV Interests
|
Sherlock, Breaking Bad, Dexter, Prison Break
|
Film Interests
|
The Bourne Trilogy, James Bond, The Machinist, How
I Live Now, Drive
|
Music Interests
|
Electronica, Rock, Classical
|
Use of multi-media
|
Social networking, Web-surfing, Netflix/Lovefilm
|
Class
|
Middle
|
The
BBFC (British Board of Film Classification) would be a 15 for our film. This is
because it contains strong violence such as the strangulation in the opening
scene. According to the BBFC website this is allowed in a 15 movie but ‘it
should not dwell on the infliction of pain or injury’ of which ours does not. This obviously impacts as a whole who would be
able to watch our film, however it does not affect our target audience, as it
is 16-23 year olds. This violence would likely be frequent throughout the film,
had it been complete. For the BBFC to classify our film as an 18 in our
instance there would need to be ‘very strong violence’ with ‘strong blood and
gore’ and probably ‘frequent strong language’. If our film was to be rated an
18 because of any of these reasons it is quite possible that the group would
consider cutting video to keep to our 15 rating. This is mainly because of the
effect it would have on our target audience; not being able to watch it. One of
the main purposes of our film is to explore and challenge typical thriller
conventions to benefit other media students therefore rating the film at 18
would be largely disadvantageous.
No comments:
Post a Comment